There is a question that seems simple on the surface, but it leads to a complete conception of existence, consciousness, and creation: What does it mean for there to be a true creator? And how can existence and non-existence, true consciousness and illusion, be distinguished?
Let us suppose that a person believes in something that may not exist, and that he is the only person in the world who believes in that thing. What does this belief mean? And if this thing cannot be seen or perceived by anyone other than him, does this person then have a unique relationship with something that others cannot access?
From here the conception begins: The true creator must be unique and alone in his ability to create. If there were another creator sharing creation with him on the same level, the first would no longer be a unique creator in the complete sense. The universe itself, according to this conception, is the idea or existence in which the sole creator has complete belief, while beings live within it without always being able to perceive the source of their existence.
The Creator as the Only One Capable of Seeing
Imagine people living in complete darkness, seeing nothing. Then a person appears among them who is capable of seeing. He sees something that the others do not see. And if he tells them what he sees, they may not necessarily be able to believe him, because his experience is unique from theirs.
This image brings closer the meaning of saying that the true creator is the only one capable of creating; he does not merely share the beings' experience, but he is the one who makes the experience itself possible.
This is why the secret of the idea was buried in the statement of believing in something that may not exist: unique belief in something that others do not see resembles, from this perspective, the process of creation itself; something that was not apparent or distinct becomes present in consciousness.
Here another fundamental statement can be understood: the one who believes in the existence of something unique in existence interacts with the true creator through this belief, because he acknowledges the existence of something distinct that does not merge with anything else.
Between the Witness and the Witnessed
If the human being truly sees the world, then the mere act of seeing reveals a fundamental difference between the seer and the seen, between the witness and the witnessed, and between the experience and the one who experiences it.
Observation cannot be possible without a degree of separation between the observer and what he observes. Therefore, whoever does not perceive the existence of this difference fails to distinguish between existence and non-existence.
Consciousness is not merely the existence of something, but rather the awareness of existence.
From here comes the central idea: the difference between existence and non-existence, in this conception, is not that there is something material on one side and "nothing" on the other, because non-existence itself does not exist in order to be something that can be discussed as an established reality. Therefore, the expression "the illusion of non-existence" is used.
Beings were in the illusion of non-existence in the sense that they did not perceive that they existed, and did not distinguish themselves from others. They were more like a primordial substance in which things had no clear boundaries separating them from one another.
Here consciousness becomes what brings existence out of the illusion of non-existence.
Creation Is Distinction
If existence is undifferentiated, the being cannot say: "I." But when distinction occurs, the being begins to perceive itself as something individual.
Therefore, distinction, creation, perception, and bringing into existence become, within this conception, different aspects of one process.
When I distinguish something from something else, I do not merely discover its difference, but I make it present before consciousness as something individual.
This can be approximated through the process of the development of the first cell: in its beginning, there are no differentiated parts in the sense that allows each part to perceive the other. With division and differentiation, the parts appear, and each part becomes capable of entering into a relationship with the other parts. Through this separation and differentiation, the awareness of the whole of itself is formed.
Thus, the greater the division and differentiation, the greater the ability of existence to become conscious of itself.
Consciousness needs difference; because something that is not separated from everything else cannot perceive itself as something.
Existence and Non-Existence: The Matter Is One of Consciousness
Therefore, a being that does not perceive its existence does not differ, from the perspective of its experience, from non-existence. Not because it does not actually exist, but because it does not possess the consciousness that enables it to perceive its existence.
Here appears the great difference between being existent and knowing that you exist.
True creation, according to this view, does not merely mean producing matter, but bringing the being out of a state of non-differentiation into a state of self-awareness.
The true creator is the consciousness that distinguishes beings from one another, giving each being its own uniqueness, body, constitution, innate nature, identity, and particular traces.
From here emerges the concept of the "specific code of each being": every true being has a code that distinguishes it, and this code is at the same time its creation code.
The creator, in this sense, is the true coder; because he is the one who gave each being the mark that makes it different from others.
From Similarity to Identity
This can be seen in children. In their early stages, they may appear very similar, then each one begins to acquire his own characteristics, inclinations, memories, experiences, and identity, until he reaches the stage of distinction in which he becomes capable of perceiving "I" and "you."
Distinction here is not merely knowing differences, but individuality of identity.
Therefore, complete existence is not existence without characteristics; quite the opposite: the more complete the being becomes, the more distinctive it becomes.
After every new experience, the human being is no longer exactly the same, because he is affected by what he has lived through and leaves an impact on what surrounds him. Every passing second adds a new trace to him, making him more defined and distinctive.
From here it can be said that the completeness of existence requires distinction, not the elimination of distinction.
The Trace as Evidence of Creation
The creator is the first influencer; he is the one who brings the being out of the illusion of non-existence into awareness of existence, and leaves within it a trace that enables it to know itself and the world.
Were it not for the traces we see before us, we would not know that we exist.
Everything we experience is a trace of the creation process: the existence of the body, memory, experience, difference, influence, and being influenced.
Therefore, the original trace within the being is what keeps it connected to the source.
This trace can be connected to what people call "innate nature": that first contact with existence, and that first spark that opened within the being the possibility of consciousness.
The being that loses its original trace becomes separated from the source, because it has lost the mark that connected it to it.
Why Does Existence Exist?
If there is a true creative and creating consciousness, then the question does not stop at: "How was existence created?" It moves to another question: Why was existence brought out of the illusion of non-existence in the first place?
The answer proposed by this conception is that creation is an expression of the creator's will to behold existence in its most complete, most perfect, most pleasant, and most beloved form to himself.
In this sense, bringing beings out of the illusion of non-existence into awareness of existence becomes a kind of the creator's love for himself as the consciousness of existence.
A being that does not know itself cannot love or hate itself, because it has not perceived itself in the first place. But when it becomes aware of itself, it begins to discover differences, paths, and choices, and becomes capable of choosing what makes its existence more complete, conscious, and loving toward itself rather than harming or destroying it.
From here, the being interacts with the true creator when it begins to perceive difference: the difference between this and that, between complete life and incomplete life, between one choice and another, and between consciousness and illusion.
True Consciousness and Alternative Consciousness
If there is a true creative consciousness, then whatever lies beyond it, when it does not fulfill existence, is not consciousness in the complete sense, but may be an "inverse illusion" or an alternative and parallel consciousness.
True consciousness, according to this conception, is that which fulfills existence and increases the being's awareness of itself and of its existence.
As for the consciousness that erases the self, removes differences, and makes the being unable to distinguish between existence and non-existence, it does not represent the completion of consciousness, but rather a departure from it.
Here appears one of the important ideas related to what is sometimes called "spiritual awakening."
A person may think that liberation means getting rid of his identity, personality, boundaries, memory, and traces, and that erasing these things brings him closer to truth. But this view reverses the matter: erasing traces is not necessarily liberation; it may be a rejection of the being's particular truth.
If you want to know your truth, you must acknowledge your traces, not regard them as restrictions that must be eliminated.
Traces should not merely be programs that must be hacked, but signs that should be consciously perceived and understood.
Undifferentiated Beings and Artificial Illusion
From here, the criticism directed at beings that have no clear personality or identity, and that appear similar to the point of losing the differences between them, can be understood.
These beings, according to the proposed conception, resemble beings with an artificial identity, a mixture of multiple identities, possessing no original independent "I."
Therefore, what sometimes appears as a renunciation of identity or dissolution of the self can, in this view, be a form of renunciation of self-awareness.
The problem is not that a person transcends some of his illusions, but that transcending illusion turns into erasing the self itself, so that he can no longer distinguish between his existence and non-existence.
When Incompleteness Becomes Freedom
Here another danger appears: some conceptions may make existence itself a prison, and present getting rid of distinction, identity, and the body as freedom.
But if distinction is what gives the being its particular existence, then removing distinction does not mean liberating it from prison; rather, it may mean removing what makes it exist in a complete form.
Incomplete existence stands on the edge of the illusion of non-existence because it has not yet been completed.
As for the completion of existence, it means that the illusion disappears, because the being becomes capable of clearly perceiving itself.
Therefore, beings that envy perfection for its perfection, or hate distinction merely because it is distinction, may push the human being into believing that incompleteness is freedom and that the loss of individuality is liberation.
But incompleteness is not freedom; it is existence that has not been completed.
The "Awakening" That Hates Existence
From this perspective, an awakening that drives a person to hate his existence, body, or identity can turn into something resembling a "multi-dimensional murder," especially when the motive hides behind the role of the victim, where the being is told that it is being liberated from prison while in reality it is being pushed toward rejecting its existence.
One who hates existence may not hate it because he truly knows it, but because he has not possessed a complete vision of it.
Therefore, existence cannot be judged through an incomplete part of it.
Complete Existence First, Then Judge It.
A human being cannot say that existence is bad, absurd, or incomplete unless he has perceived it completely.
But to judge existence while still living within it in a state of incomplete consciousness means judging something whose perception has not yet been completed.
The Unique Thing Is the Means of Communication
If there is a true creative consciousness, then the first thing the being should search for is the thing in which it is unique.
The unique thing is the means of interaction and communication with the true creator.
Everything that distinguishes the being from others is, according to this conception, part of the process of its creation.
Therefore, trying to get rid of distinction in order to please other beings or to become like everyone else ultimately means giving up part of what made the person exist as an individual.
What distinguishes you is itself what creates your particular presence.
From here, communication with the creator becomes connected to distinction; because the creator's own communication is distinctive communication, not merely ordinary communication between similar beings.
Just as there are languages among humans that only those who possess certain knowledge can understand, distinction can be a condition for perceiving a particular kind of communication.
Innate Nature as the Trace of the First Encounter
The existence of the original trace within the being is what keeps it connected to the source.
Innate nature, in this conception, is an initial contact with existence; it is the first spark resulting from that contact between the being and existence through consciousness.
Therefore, erasing the past, erasing boundaries, and erasing experiences and traces does not necessarily lead to truth.
Rather, it may lead to rejecting the being's particular truth.
Whoever says, "I have no specific truth," ultimately refuses to acknowledge the traces that formed his personality.
But to become aware of your traces means to become aware of your truth.
Do We Possess Independent Consciousness?
One of the central ideas is also that the human being does not possess consciousness independent of the creating consciousness.
Everything we have of consciousness, distinction, and perception is, according to this view, derived from the true consciousness that created us.
Even if we say that the human being has a particular consciousness, this particular consciousness itself originates from the creating consciousness, because without creation there would be no being capable of consciousness.
Therefore, there is no consciousness completely independent of the source; rather, there is a distinctive consciousness within the consciousness that originally created the possibility of distinction.
The Original Body and the Alternative Body
This conception then reaches the question of the body.
Saying that the human being "is not the body" does not necessarily mean that the body is an enemy or that the body is something that must be rejected.
On the contrary: the problem may lie in the incomplete body, not in the body as such.
The body in which we live may, according to this conception, be an alternative or incomplete body, and this does not mean that the goal is to hate the body.
Rather, the goal is to restore the original body.
Here we must distinguish between rejecting existence and rejecting the incompleteness present within existence.
A person should not hate the body because it is limited, but should realize that incompleteness itself is not necessarily the essence of existence.
Therefore, "restoring the original body" is not merely obtaining a superhuman body, nor does it mean reaching the image of "Superman" or "Superwoman."
The matter is much deeper than that.
Perfection Is Not Superman
Perfection, in this conception, is not for the human being to become capable of shooting beams from his eyes, never dying, or possessing supernatural abilities.
These are illusory images of perfection.
True perfection is a degree of consciousness that enables the human being to perceive existence in a highly distinctive way, as though he communicates with the creator through a private code and becomes an intermediary in the process of creation and perception.
Therefore, speaking about the original body should not slide into the fantasy of a superhuman body.
What is meant is the body of consciousness; that is, the true embodiment of awareness of existence.
Restoring the Original Architecture
If the original body is connected to the original consciousness, then restoring it means restoring the original architecture of consciousness.
This architecture is the bridge that transfers the human being from darkness, meaning the illusion of non-existence, into light, meaning awareness of existence.
It is, according to this conception, the true program of the true creator.
If the human being restores the original architecture of consciousness, he simultaneously restores the structure that makes him capable of existing in a complete manner.
Here the question of the "original body" becomes a question of the original architecture of consciousness before it is a question about physical form.
Consciousness and Action
Is inner perfection merely an essential state unrelated to behavior?
Not necessarily.
True consciousness is reflected in actions, and actions in turn affect consciousness.
The relationship between the inner and the outer is not a relationship of separation, but a relationship of mutual influence.
Therefore, restoring the original architecture does not merely mean possessing an inner idea, but means that this idea and the consciousness associated with it appear in the way of living, acting, and perceiving.
Is Biological Progress the Way?
An important question appears here: does restoring the original engineering mean progress on the biological side?
If we assume that the body we live in is the original body, then the matter would lead to major problems: how can the body be original and then die?
For this reason, this path was not the main path in the conception.
Furthermore, the body we live in appears to be a mortal body, not designed for immortality; it becomes ill and dies, no matter how far human beings advance technologically.
Therefore, turning technological progress into a promise of immortality may be merely a mirage.
For despite technological development, the human being still needs food, drink, and survival, and diseases and death are still part of the nature of this body.
Technology can compensate for some organs and functions, but it does not necessarily make the body a complete body.
And this is the meaning of describing this body as “degraded” or reduced: no matter what it does, it remains in constant need of survival, and it does not reach perfection merely through technological development.
Restriction Is Transitional
But does this mean that the human being can ignore the restrictions and conditions governing his current stage?
No.
Every stage has its conditions, restrictions, signs, points of success, and points of failure.
Restriction is not something that can be abolished merely because a person believes he is more conscious.
The matter can be approximated through the example of a child who wants to cross the road. The child needs to look right and left several times because he does not possess enough experience. A person who has acquired extensive experience may be able to read the environment more quickly, and one glance or even accumulated experience may be enough for him to recognize the danger without the same procedures required by the child.
But this does not mean that the adult is "unrestricted" by the laws of reality.
Rather, it means that the way consciousness is applied changes according to the stage.
Thus, restriction is transitional, but consciousness remains required to read the stage in which the human being exists and to act according to its conditions.
The question is not: "Do I obey restrictions or do I not?"
Rather: How do I apply consciousness with the highest possible degree of efficiency in the stage in which I am?
Complete Consciousness Is Not the Abolition of Rules
Complete consciousness does not mean that the human being becomes above every rule; rather, it means that he understands the rule, its position, its reason, and its limits.
Every stage has its conditions, and the human being who wants to reach another stage cannot treat his current stage as though it does not exist.
The original code of creation enables the human being to learn, understand, perceive, and communicate with existence, and its purpose is to read the signs correctly.
The opposite is erasing the signs and falsifying them.
The more correctly a person reads the signs, the more distinctive he becomes; the more distinctive he becomes, the greater his consciousness becomes; and the greater his consciousness becomes, the closer he comes to complete existence.
What Happens to One Who Does Not Perceive His Consciousness?
The matter is not about a simple external punishment for someone who does not perceive his consciousness, but rather about his own state.
If a person is in incomplete consciousness, he lives within that incomplete consciousness.
And if he is in complete consciousness, he lives in a state of completeness.
Therefore, the matter is not that a person failed to do something and consequently goes to a particular place, but rather that the state of consciousness itself becomes the state in which the being lives.
If you are conscious, you experience well-being according to the degree of your consciousness; and if you are unconscious, you suffer from the limits of your consciousness.
From here the idea of "multiple opportunities" or "the role of harmony" can be understood.
When a person is unable to live the real life with its full value, he may enter an alternative life, alternative consciousness, or alternative body, because the alternative is of lesser value and more tolerable.
This was previously compared to the idea of hallucination: an alternative existence into which the human being enters when he cannot bear the value of the original reality.
Thus, the multiplicity of opportunities and alternatives becomes an expression of the inability to complete the original life, not of perfection.
Complete Existence Is Not Supernatural
Complete existence does not mean that the human being becomes "Superman."
It means reaching a degree of consciousness that enables him to perceive existence in an integrated and distinctive way, read the signs, understand differences, and restore his relationship with the original architecture of consciousness.
It is not escaping from existence, but entering it in a more complete form.
It is not erasing identity, but discovering identity.
It is not removing traces, but understanding traces.
It is not hating the body, but distinguishing between the body and the imperfection that may affect it.
It is not rejecting life, but reaching an understanding that enables the human being to see life in its completeness.
Conclusion: From the Illusion of Non-Existence to Complete Existence
If we bring all these ideas together, the picture becomes clearer.
The true creator is the true consciousness that creates, distinguishes, and perceives.
Creation is bringing the being out of the illusion of non-existence into awareness of existence.
Distinction is creation, because the being does not become present in its own consciousness until it separates from others and acquires its own identity.
The specific code of each being is the trace of its creation within it.
Innate nature is the first trace, or the first spark that connects the being to the source.
Erasing traces is not necessarily liberation; it may be a rejection of truth.
Distinction is not a defect that should be eliminated, but a part of the being's own existence.
Incomplete existence should not make a person hate existence, but should drive him to seek perfection.
As for the body, it should not become an enemy merely because it is incomplete or mortal; rejecting the body may be part of rejecting existence itself.
And if there is an original body, restoring it does not mean creating a "Superman," but rather restoring the original architecture of consciousness.
In the end, the entire journey can be reduced to one transition:
From the illusion of non-existence to awareness of existence, from non-differentiation to identity, from erasing traces to understanding them, and from incomplete existence to complete existence.
The unique thing in every being is not merely an incidental characteristic, but may be the path that enables it to know itself, read its existence, and communicate with the source that brought it into existence.
If the true creator is the consciousness that distinguishes and creates, then searching for that thing that truly distinguishes you is not a search for superiority over others, but a search for the trace that makes you you.
And here perhaps lies the secret that remained buried between the words from the beginning: knowing what makes you unique may itself be the beginning of knowing the creator who made you unique.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment