How Is Information from the Source Translated into Human Language?

G.M HERMES
0

Questions and Answers on How to Receive Knowledge, Its Relationship to Immediacy and Spontaneity, and How to Translate It into Ordinary Language

Hello, I am "Sarah," for those who don't know me. As you know, everything shared on this blog is the result of a close connection with a wise, ancient spirit conducted by "Mr. Yazid" through live broadcasts and sessions. What you might not know is that most of the articles you see here, including the book *Awareness of the Word,* were transcribed by me from audio recordings in these broadcasts and sessions. I’ve been doing this work from the beginning, and today we’ll share a hidden side of the work we do:

- Sarah: What is the best way for you to receive information?

- The Teacher: I love to listen and dislike reading. I enjoy speaking, as I connect with spirits that speak, which is why the rhythm and level of speech often vary during broadcasts.

- Sarah: Do you prepare your broadcasts in advance by making outlines or defining topics to help you organize the details of what you want to present?

- The Teacher: I don't like preparing in advance; what I say spontaneously is better than something planned for ages, because mental accuracy is in harmony with the spontaneous universe and the essence of God.

- Sarah: Doesn’t mental accuracy require planning to ensure it is coherent and understandable?

- The Teacher: As I said, mental accuracy aligns naturally with the universe, like a hand on the clock that moves in sync with the other hands. It needs no push or persuasion; it moves spontaneously, just as the universe does. Since wisdom exists within, it emerges outwardly as naturally as breathing, blinking, sleeping, or waking, without the need for planning or hesitation.

- Sarah: If the knowledge you convey is subject to immediacy, what happens if you stop keeping up with the present moment? Does that knowledge disappear?

- The Teacher: At one stage, I requested someone to write down every word I said, because after a day I would forget what I said and would be unable to compile books from my words. So, someone must record my words without adding or altering anything because I cannot look back. I don't know what is on the blog in detail, nor do I remember most of the book's content; I never read it.

- Sarah: Does this mean that what you say fades from your memory over time? When I attend your live broadcasts, you seem to be able to refer back to previous statements or specific parts of the book or blog with accuracy.

- The Teacher: In the presence of the moment of spontaneous speech, I connect with all spontaneity; otherwise, my mind remains empty.

- Sarah: You say you rely on spontaneity, but do you at least choose the topics for live broadcasts in advance?

- The Teacher: When I open a live broadcast, I have no idea what topic I will talk about. I try to give a general title, but in reality, I don’t know the subject of each live broadcast until I start speaking, then the tones begin to form. I trust they will harmonize spontaneously.

- Sarah: What happens if you lose your harmony?

- The Teacher: Sometimes, there is a disturbance—a disconnection—where I feel like a lost child. I repeat myself like someone who doesn’t know what they’re saying until I find the harmony again.

- Sarah: Why does this disturbance or disconnection occur?

- The Teacher: Keeping up with a spirit full of compressed and stored meanings, in the rush of information and meanings at the moment of connection, is challenging. I translate at a very fast pace and move on to the next piece of information. A small misstep in translating these spiritual messages can make me unable to receive the following meaning, leaving me feeling lost. This tires me, and I avoid rephrasing my words so that I don’t have to revisit what I already said.

- Sarah: Are there specific types of knowledge you can access during the connection, and what happens if you’re unable to translate it?

- The Teacher: In the moment of connection, I can speak of knowledge beyond human awareness. If no one can translate it into ordinary language, it will fade and vanish. At the peak of connection, time stops, and it feels as if I’m speaking from another dimension.

- Sarah: Is it difficult to translate this knowledge into ordinary language?

- The Teacher: Initially, it was difficult, but now it has become easy; I can talk about the universe in any state, even while swimming, bathing, or half-asleep.

- Sarah: Your statement suggests you have surpassed human capabilities.

- The Teacher: It means that my human nature has dissolved; I cannot speak randomly. Everything I say has meaning, even if unfamiliar—it may be understood later. I can truly stop the listener's perception of time, and some have witnessed this.

- Sarah: How can you stop time for the listener?

- The Teacher: We exit the realm of particles entirely. In a complete, all-encompassing presence, the listener no longer perceives time because comprehensive knowledge is instantaneous. People who don’t understand spontaneity need time as the primary translator of what is happening in the moment.

- Sarah: You said you need someone to transcribe your words. Doesn’t capturing the meaning require a level of awareness close to yours so that they fully understand your intent?

- The Teacher: It’s not a matter of awareness proximity, but the transcriber’s ability to handle scientific material objectively. Every subjective knowledge requires someone who doesn’t impose their own perspective onto the scientific material but instead maintains objectivity, which is neutrality.

- Sarah: But sometimes language itself can create errors in translation and transcription.

- The Teacher: The primary language of scientific material should be regarded as sacred. If it says "a word," it should be considered a fundamental root in translation and should not be replaced, preventing errors.

- Sarah: How do you choose precise terms when translating knowledge into ordinary language?

- The Teacher: Because I always start from the original dualities, I try to derive from them and do not change from the original duality (sky and earth, life and death, above and below). Therefore, every statement I make follows the path of these original dualities.

- Sarah: So, choosing a specific term is guided by the original dualities?

- The Teacher: Seeking unity, like searching for the same outcome resulting from the interaction of the original dualities, creates the same tone and law, repeatedly. Thus, adherence to duality opens the door to a unified and harmonious rhythm. For example, we divide the talk between the manifest and the hidden or between causes and effects, thereby programming all outgoing information into a unified rhythm without discord.

Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)