How Did Matrices Begin?
Inside the matrices, we find retired professional players. To understand the idea of retirement, we can compare it to Greek mythology, where we see that the gods wanted to create servants to take their place in performing their tasks. From here, the idea of slavery was linked to the retirement of the gods (those who reached divinity). Retirement means making someone else take your place within a specific system, while you receive the energy and final results without working. In another case, retirement happens because you worked in the past, and you no longer contribute to the future but rather receive the fruits of your past work without having to work again. A god, demigod, or professional player achieves their retirement by creating a system that works for them. The systems are temporary unconscious patterns that perform the task of processing inputs to outputs. The retired professional player is one who creates their own system to work for them or in their place. For example, they might establish a business that generates income, so they no longer need to focus on earning money. The concept of retirement at the cosmic level is the ability of the retired professional player to create their own universe, system, and method that frees them from engaging in the experience, by creating substitutes (avatars/alternates) who work for them. The retired player in this way exits the experience and places a substitute inside it, whether it's a system or an avatar to work in their place, ensuring that this substitute is renewed and has patterns that guarantee long-term benefits, so that they don’t need to engage in the experience again. This is achieved by charting a path for the substitute to transform into themselves. Through this understanding, everything will return to them, and they will create their own substitute who continues the evolution.
Returning to the matrix of masculinity and femininity, we find that femininity has been modified to respond to the masculinity artificially created inside the experience. This masculinity represents a special system created by entities that survived in the future—most likely feminine entities—for their own service and to go through the experience in their place. This is why we said earlier that entry into the experience is done through masculinity, as masculinity expresses experimentation, division, and discrimination. In other words, the awareness of masculinity is the awareness of the elements or the data of the experience. Since masculinity is more experimental and system-creating, this explains why femininity has been subject to the patriarchal system throughout history. And as these surviving entities, or professional players, benefit from the fruits of this system in their past, it means that the patriarchal system is highly valuable, since its effects have extended into the future and are not confined to the past. It is a system that cannot be done without, as it ensures the survival of these professional players.
This patriarchal system is rooted in the past and extends into the future, meaning that all its outputs serve the future, which represents the feminine pole. This is how we understand why these future entities are purely feminine. The surviving and retired entities are femininity that created and gave birth to a system that works for them inside the experience. The feminine pole represents the consciousness of freedom from the experience, while the consciousness of masculinity chose masculinity for experimentation because it is associated with complexity and limitation by the elements and components of the experience. So masculinity experiences instead of femininity and sends the results and outputs of its experience and rooting into the future, like a fruit representing femininity. Masculinity is a mechanism for experimentation and rooting in the past, established by these retired entities to work in their place and benefit from it. This masculinity is rooted in the past, feeding from something greater than it, like roots in the soil, aiming to be free from it in the future, while maintaining its benefits and extension. Therefore, this masculinity is of high value, as its benefits extend into the future.
This reality can be observed in the real world. Throughout history, it is the male who works and goes through experiences, while the female sits waiting to receive what the male has earned from his work. The male works for the future, and masculinity as a system actually goes through the experience and works in place of femininity, while femininity receives the benefits of that experience and its essence without needing to experiment herself. In another example, when the male manages to establish a system that works for him inside the experience, he then becomes entitled to retire, like the female, meaning that he has entered the consciousness of femininity, as he receives the benefits without working.
Imperfect or unremembered femininity has begun to compete with the male in the experience, thus losing its entitlement to retirement (retirement is when others work for you while you sit). Unaware that the patriarchal system was originally designed to serve femininity, even though femininity inside the experience is a modified response to masculinity, the system still works for her. If we return to history and look at women who were great in their time and famous for it, like queens and royalty, we find that they understood the nature of the patriarchal system and managed to take its fruits while sitting without experimenting or intervening in a way that contradicts their feminine nature, by activating their receiving ability, which is linked to their feminine essence. From this, we can conclude that masculinity leads to femininity; it is the past that becomes the future. And here we understand why the male is instinctively drawn toward the female, as she represents his future and in her, he finds his salvation. The female, as the future and salvation, may punish or reward him. Punishment might appear in not joining him, while reward happens by achieving the union, thus allowing him to reach his future and salvation. The past that does not continue to the future perishes, and likewise for the rejected or low-value male in the matrix. Even in the crawling patriarchal system, he holds no value and is at the bottom of the hierarchy. Even from a biological standpoint, in the mechanism of selection, genes that cannot keep up with evolution and continue perish and disappear, unable to move on to the future or transition from one experience to another. And as we said, the process of transitioning between experiences requires femininity because, as we said, femininity is the consciousness of liberation from experiences. Therefore, fixed principles and values representing masculinity that do not align with change (liberation) represented by femininity are rejected by femininity and cannot proceed to the future. The past is always in a state of sending because it has no past, as it is the past itself. Thus, it can never be the future, as there is no sender—it is the original sender. The low-value male in the matrix, despite not being a sender, receives nothing from others because he is rejected and lies at the bottom of the hierarchy, and there is no one below him to send to him. Sending is always forward, toward the future.
In summary, masculinity is an artificial experience aimed at selecting high-value masculine programs that cannot be dispensed with, as they achieve feminine retirement in the future. A person must create a substitute for themselves in the experience to retire, and the substitute is artificial. In this case, it is the male. The male serves as a substitute for the female in the experience and experiments for her. Here, we are not talking specifically about women and men, although this also reflects upon them, as both carry femininity and masculinity, with femininity prevailing in the female and masculinity prevailing in the male. Rather, we speak about femininity and masculinity as poles representing the future and the past, the result and the cause, the inclination and the straightness... To exit experimentation, that is, to be liberated from a certain matrix once and for all, requires the presence of the hierarchical system, because the retiree always needs a substitute. Exiting the matrix means introducing a substitute in your place, and in order to transition to a more comfortable matrix and benefit from new features, you will place a representative in the matrix you were in, to exit from it and gain new benefits after settling your status. Matrices are nested within one another, and each matrix is part of a larger matrix. The process of liberation from a matrix is a process of transition between levels of the mother matrix, which we symbolized by the “Egg of Maternity / Mary” in the book "Consciousness of the Word". Those who call for exiting the matrices are trapped in the consciousness of the savior, and the one claiming to have exited the matrix is in the consciousness of the victim. The goal is not to be a savior or a victim, but to be both the creator and the created, the sender and the receiver at the same time—meaning you chart your own path, and when you retire, you receive from your past work without relying on others. You retire in the future because you sent in the past.
Sending requires the center and an open space, in contrast to receiving, which does not require diagnosis and centralization. The receiver’s ability grows as they let go of diagnoses and centralization. Diagnosis is the expression of an emerging process, and emergence is a quality related to masculinity. Therefore, sending is a masculine process, while receiving is a feminine one. From here, we understand that diagnosis exists for the undiagnosed. And the feature, in essence, is meant for settlement. This settlement is the absence of distinction. For example, you are currently sending to settle your past, as if you were poor in the past, and now you are rich and searching for financial distinction. This is meant to settle your lack and close the gap caused by it, thus achieving equality.
Since sending requires the center, the personified god is masculine, and the non-personified god is feminine. Here, we are talking about an original feminine entity, not modified. This is a delicate matter: the original feminine is not in experimentation, not personified, and not tested. However, the tested and impure feminine is viewed by the male as a competitor within the experiment and is seen as an impure entity, whether acknowledged or not. The male seeks a feminine entity with no past, while the female seeks a male with a strong past.
.png)
.png)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.jpg)
.jpeg)
No comments:
Post a Comment